jtag
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
jtag [2020/06/12 16:45] – [mini ST-LINK V2] kingkevin | jtag [2020/06/21 06:27] – [SEGGER J-Link] mention clone kingkevin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | Instead on an STM32F103, this dongle uses a [[http:// | + | Instead on an STM32F103, this dongle uses a [[http:// |
I've seen pin compatible alternatives (ST STM8S003 vs Nuvoton N76E003), even architecture compatible (ST STM32F103 vs GigeDevice GD32F103), but they always had some differences (architecture, | I've seen pin compatible alternatives (ST STM8S003 vs Nuvoton N76E003), even architecture compatible (ST STM32F103 vs GigeDevice GD32F103), but they always had some differences (architecture, | ||
The CS32F103 seems like a complete clone of the STM32F103 (exact same pinout, architecture, | The CS32F103 seems like a complete clone of the STM32F103 (exact same pinout, architecture, | ||
Line 413: | Line 413: | ||
But v8 and v9 are not supported anymore by J-Link, meaning no new feature will be added to them. | But v8 and v9 are not supported anymore by J-Link, meaning no new feature will be added to them. | ||
Instead I recommend to get the [[https:// | Instead I recommend to get the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here pictures from devices not from official distributors, | ||
They come in the same case: | They come in the same case: |
jtag.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/07 17:49 by 127.0.0.1