Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- jtag [2019/04/15 20:51] – [SEGGER J-Link] add jlink v10 kingkevin
+++ jtag [2019/09/05 17:14] – [mini ST-LINK V2] kingkevin
@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 For $9 you can't expect more, and if you want a cheap adapter I recommend the other ones (see below).
-==== ST-LINK V2 aluminium ====
+==== mini ST-LINK V2 ====
 These adapters come in a small dongle sized aluminium case.
@@ Line 144: / Line 144: @@
 This variant uses an STM32F103 in the UFQFN-48 package.
 This is just a couple of cents cheaper than the more traditional TQFP-48 package, but this is enough en mass to change the footprint on the board.
+=== MINI ST-Link V2E ===
+{{:jtag:stlink_cks_case.jpg?0x100|}}
+{{:jtag:stlink_cks_front.jpg?0x100|}}
+{{:jtag:stlink_cks_back.jpg?0x100|}}
+Instead on an STM32F103, this dongle uses a [[http://www.cksic.com/en/|CKS]] {{ :jtag:ic_mcu_cks_cks32f103xb.pdf|CS32F103}} (sometimes CKS32F103)  ({{ :jtag:ic_mcu_cks_cks32f103xb_en.pdf|datasheet translated to english}}).
+I've seen pin compatible alternatives (ST STM8S003 vs Nuvoton N76E003), even architecture compatible (ST STM32F103 vs GigeDevice GD32F103), but they always had some differences (architecture, electrical pin properties, registers, ...).
+The CS32F103 seems like a complete clone of the STM32F103 (exact same pinout, architecture, registers).
+So far I could not not see any difference (I tested flash, USB, SWD).
+I guess this micro-controller is so popular that it was just a question of time until it was ripped-off.
+To check if this is a complete clone you could decapsulate the chip and compare the silicon die, or check the errata behaviour (I can't imagine they re-implemented it themselves, up to the mistakes).
+The next step would be to have a CS32F103 chip in a package marked as STM32F103.
 ==== Baite ====

CuVoodoo

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools