Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- jtag [2019/02/20 11:50] – [SEGGER J-Link] kingkevin
+++ jtag [2019/03/09 09:27] – [Texas Instruments XDS100v3] kingkevin
@@ Line 356: / Line 356: @@
 The [[https://www.segger.com/jlink_base.html|SEGGER J-Link]] supports JTAG, SWD, SWO, RTCK, and voltage reference (or provide 3.3V).
 That makes it one of the most complete JTAG adapter.
+The differences between the versions are documented [[https://wiki.segger.com/Software_and_Hardware_Features_Overview|here]].
-There are plenty of different J-Link clones available, from light version with the minimum number of components, to full version with all features.
+There are plenty of different J-Link v8 and v9 clones available, from light version with the minimum number of components, to full version with all features.
+But v8 and v9 are not supported anymore by J-Link, meaning no new feature will be added to them.
+Instead I recommend to get the [[https://www.segger.com/products/debug-probes/j-link/models/j-link-edu/|J-Link EDU]] which is a supported v10 and not expensive.
 The come in the same case:
@@ Line 381: / Line 384: @@
 ===== Texas Instruments XDS100v3 =====
-The [[http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/XDS100|XDS100v3]] supports cJTAG (aka. IEEE 1149.7, or SWD alternative), but I did not have the opportunity to test it yet.
+The [[http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/XDS100|XDS100v3]] supports cJTAG (aka. IEEE 1149.7, or SWD alternative), but I have not been able to successfully use it yet.
+Note: this adapter uses the [[http://software-dl.ti.com/ccs/esd/documents/xdsdebugprobes/emu_jtag_connectors.html|TI 20-pin (cTI) pinout]].
 {{:jtag:xds100v3_case.jpg?0x150|device}}

CuVoodoo

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools