jtag
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
jtag [2018/12/09 14:30] – [DISTORTEC JTAG-lock-pick Tiny 2] kingkevin | jtag [2019/03/09 09:27] – [Texas Instruments XDS100v3] kingkevin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | {{: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
Line 355: | Line 354: | ||
===== SEGGER J-Link ===== | ===== SEGGER J-Link ===== | ||
- | The [[http://www.aliexpress.com/item/ | + | The [[https://www.segger.com/jlink_base.html|SEGGER J-Link]] |
+ | That makes it one of the most complete JTAG adapter. | ||
+ | The differences between the versions are documented [[https://wiki.segger.com/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are plenty of different J-Link v8 and v9 clones available, from light version with the minimum number of components, to full version with all features. | ||
+ | But v8 and v9 are not supported anymore by J-Link, meaning no new feature will be added to them. | ||
+ | Instead I recommend to get the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | The come in the same case: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | {{: | ||
- | It supports JTAG, SWD, SWO, RTCK, and voltage reference. | + | Here a J-Link v8 with large passives: |
- | That makes it the most complete JTAG adapter I have. | + | |
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here a J-Link v8 with smaller and a bit less passives: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here a light J-Link v9. | ||
+ | v9 uses a STM32F205 (providing 20 MHz JTAG/15 MHz SWD) while v8 uses a AT91SAM7S (providing 10 MHz JTAG/4 MHz SWD): | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
===== Texas Instruments XDS100v3 ===== | ===== Texas Instruments XDS100v3 ===== | ||
- | The [[http:// | + | The [[http:// |
+ | |||
+ | Note: this adapter uses the [[http:// | ||
{{: | {{: |
jtag.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/07 17:49 by 127.0.0.1