jtag
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
jtag [2017/09/06 14:14] – [Black Magic Probe] kingkevin | jtag [2017/09/06 14:38] – [ST-LINK/V2 clone] kingkevin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
It comes in the same box, with the same cables, the enclosure is the same, even the board name has been taken over (MB936), but the board isn't the same. | It comes in the same box, with the same cables, the enclosure is the same, even the board name has been taken over (MB936), but the board isn't the same. | ||
The BOM doesn' | The BOM doesn' | ||
- | The original adapter | + | The original adapter |
This is completely missing on the clone since the connector pins are directly connected to the micro-controller. | This is completely missing on the clone since the connector pins are directly connected to the micro-controller. | ||
Thus it only supports target signal levels of 3.3V and sometimes 5V since the pins are 5V tolerant. | Thus it only supports target signal levels of 3.3V and sometimes 5V since the pins are 5V tolerant. | ||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
* the ARM Cortex SWJ connector uses a small header (not very dupont-wire friendly) | * the ARM Cortex SWJ connector uses a small header (not very dupont-wire friendly) | ||
* the separate UART is not always populated (UART is also available on the SWJ connector) | * the separate UART is not always populated (UART is also available on the SWJ connector) | ||
- | * it is expensive (> $50), but this price is quite reasonable since it help supporting | + | * it is expensive (> $50), but this price is quite reasonable since it supports |
* it was sold out for quite some time, encouraging me to look for an alternative | * it was sold out for quite some time, encouraging me to look for an alternative | ||
jtag.txt · Last modified: 2024/01/07 17:49 by 127.0.0.1