busvoodoo
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| busvoodoo [2017/12/22 16:57] – [alternatives] low speed kingkevin | busvoodoo [2017/12/22 17:00] – [features] low speed kingkevin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| But it is not intended to replace all the other special purpose adapters (USB to UART, JTAG, ...) which probably can better solve specific task because their are: more stable, simpler, more powerful, faster, more stable, cheaper, or more available. | But it is not intended to replace all the other special purpose adapters (USB to UART, JTAG, ...) which probably can better solve specific task because their are: more stable, simpler, more powerful, faster, more stable, cheaper, or more available. | ||
| Thus the BusVoodoo is a good choice to start with, but if you want better performances switch to a device designed for each particular task. | Thus the BusVoodoo is a good choice to start with, but if you want better performances switch to a device designed for each particular task. | ||
| + | And if you want to debug high-speed protocols you will need a complete different class of adapter. | ||
| === not community driven: === | === not community driven: === | ||